Thread:Kushieda minori/@comment-36.83.54.92-20160205034329/@comment-36.83.62.25-20160209141751

i did a few testing (maybe about 30-40 battles, i didn't count), and i can say that for me its "more risk with more reward". i want to test with nina, because she dont need many buff, but then i got a copy of Hiraga so i use her instead. since i was testing my team survability, i think it doesnt matter if i use nina or hiraga (am i right or i missing something?)

with my previous team (HL, Choco candy, 2 Hyper, SO), it doesnt matter whoever hit by unleasher, every skill unleash will increase my winning chance (and overkill chance). unleash buffer -> get closer to dmg cap, unleash null -> block field/skill to give more time to set up, and if null is ready, i get guaranted buff from unleash.

after i replace Choco candy with Hiraga, i need more time to set up, since unleasher now can target the "wrong" card. if it target Hiraga (with skill ready before), it doesnt increase my winning chance. and if it keep targeting Hiraga, i'll end up lose the battle. but if i can set it fast, i can get overkill more than before (3-5m). it just rough estimation (with low sample), but i think my winning chance decrease from ~90% to ~75-80%. i also try to keep choco candy and replace 1 alchemist with hiraga (2 buff 1 unleash instead of 1 buff 2 unleash), and the result isn't better. i didnt try to swap Oracle because i think it'll be worse if i dont have nuller.

from this test, i think maybe even if i have GUR Gilgamesh (or Nina/Hiraga) with max stats, the result will not much different, i will still lose if unleasher keep targeting the multihit card, because my other card cant survive long enough.

so, how how do you think about it? give me some enlightment :)