Talk:Speedster/@comment-103.224.119.154-20160526224121/@comment-24662563-20160529222332

Speedster is still better than Rogue, after 5 attacks Speedster's buff is stacked all the way up to 894.66% attack total, which is also guaranteed to be up for your 6th attack, scalating to it before reaching it.

Rogue The Savior's buff is +500% (for a 600% attack total), and at 15% chance it will on average proc by your 5th turn, at that point Speedster would have 4 stacks (guaranteed) of her buff for an only slightly inferior 577.2% attack total, that goes well over it the next turn, it's also very likely Rogue won't proc for several more turns.

If you have Rogue The Vengeful instead or just Rogue, the 10% proc chance means she will proc on average by turn 7, and she's far more likely to go a lot longer without a proc, for what is also a weaker buff

And finally, Speedster won't consume unleasher procs, so all unleasher procs will go to your other attack buffer, while if Rogue gets an unleash before she procs on her own, she won't proc on her own at all after that

Rogue is a better choice if you can set her up on a team where she's the only one that can be hit by your unleasher(s) (or she and a nuller, which won't be hit while the null is set and ready), but other than that, go with Speedster.

PS: The default Shwartz is also better than Ghostly Shwartz IMO, attack skill only null isn't very usefull, what you really want the nulls for when fighting FAWs are the fields that take your buffs away, I feel the passive 100% unit attack buff on Shwartz is superior to the attack only null on Ghostly Shwartz.