Talk:Dancing Sally/@comment-24999710-20170110182116/@comment-16682378-20170111175238

@Felyndiira: Yes I'm aware you didn't say Xwwvivwwx's proposed team & the standard Letta team were equal, just as I never said you said that - putting words in other person mouths goes both ways. I was mearly trying to explain my point, the standard is better in all aspects (just like you point out). And if I'm correct Xwvivwx isn't exactly a noob, and it's about improving our current teams. I don't think I dismissed the proposed setup entirely for noobs etc, if I did that was never the intent, I accually said DS is a good card in my first response.

I have to admit I forgot about Red Sally's autobuff though (I think it would still take 3 turns to use 3 autobuffs, unless RS buffs first thing every turn).

So yes it might work for players lacking the standard versions of Salvo teams. But weather DS have 1 or 2 procc, wouldn't make that big a difference you would still need to wait for a 2nd procc or procc's from unleashers while buffed to x35 - if you wanna hit for ~25M which obviously is the point.

In my experience I don't have that big a problem with buffers missbehaving while using standard 2xSalvo team, not even during off-element days. I accually have a bigger 'problem' with the Letta team which often get not just fielded but debuffed as well, which of course is easily fixed with a 2nd Letta tap. This imo might be a bigger problem for the proposed team, lowering the damage output further.

As for the addition of a 2nd Letta - thats just silly (for newer players). By the same logic that you dismiss the multiple Oracles, these players won't have multiple Letta's either.

And I never said your constantly going to hit with x10, I said you will hit for x10 towards the end for a large portion of the hits, although it should say 'for a large portion of the latter hits', certainly not every time but it will happen. Might have been a little fuzzy there, but we're aiming for a safe 25M overkill team, right?