Talk:Dancing Sally/@comment-24999710-20170110182116/@comment-29349735-20170111065430

@LJCrew: You're putting words in my mouth. I never said that Xwvivwx's suggested team is comparable to the Letta team or even made any attempt to evaluate his/her suggested team. I only clarified one thing - that for the purposes of overkill, the difference between a x33 and a x35 multiplier is insignificantly miniscule.

But sure, let's talk about the proposed team.

Trying to compare Xwvivwx's team idea against the standard Letta is a bit silly. The standard Letta team is an elite team requiring powerful unique cards, and is a team that almost no one can field four of (I could only field two of them, and iirc you can only field one). Many players simply do not have that many celestial oracles or wise oracles to spare. Also, for a lot of players, this is their first time even having access to a salvo card. A team with mostly Sallys would have be great for those players.

You overestimate the chance of AW Field. With a standard 2xSalvo team, your buffer misbehaving is a bigger problem than your buff getting wiped by archwitch field. With Red Sally, Xwviv's proposed team would have been ready in two turns (1x Letta, 3x Autobuff). Even if field occurs during this short time, you could tap the remaining Lettax2 for a decent 700k salvo finish. Fixing the buffer misbehaving is more important than field - and if you are that concerned about field, you can modifying said team a bit if you have the resources (for instance, replacing a salvo with another Letta).

Xwvivwx's team would have been fine if Sally was a 2 proc. It's not going to constantly hit x10 as you suggest; rather, it would be pretty reliable, and pretty good considering that it only uses free, easy-to-get cards.