Talk:Arpa/@comment-26494010-20160531034809/@comment-2098192-20160531040122

It's becuase because we don't know the order in which nulls are eaten. Can I assure my attack nuller will null attack skills first before my regular nuller?

Even if I do, once I run out of natural nulls and need to specifically replenish nulls (I use a 3 unleasher/1 nuller/nadeshiko setup) if I add an attack nuller into the mix my unleashes may hit the attack nuller instead of my full nuller. Then I get fielded. then I cry becuase the wrong nuller was hit and the field slipped through and just rendered me useless. I guess in theory you could say that you have a better chance of hitting a nuller (as in any nuller) when you are unleashing with the extra attack nuller, but again a lance will kill a card (1/5th of your firepower) while domain is run-ending (all your firepower). stopping the domain is far more important than stopping a lance.

For PvP, you run into a similar problem. If I use 4x unleasher + asterisk, then if anyone procs enemy = dead. If I use 4x arpa + asterisk, if my unelashers proc, god knows where the unleashes will land. I may have just traded a sure kill for a 'eh, hopefully I got enough attack nulls' when arpa hits herself.

If you are replacing a pure 2nd nuller (would you run 2 nullers in pvp? vs domain LAW?) then maybe that is her niche. From where I stand it seems like a step down.